tech
“Hard Fork” is a show about the future that’s already here. Each week, journalists Kevin Roose and Casey Newton explore and make sense of the latest in the rapidly changing world of tech. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. You can also subscribe via your favorite podcast app here https://www.nytimes.com/activate-access/audio?source=podcatcher. For more podcasts and narrated articles, download The New York Times app at nytimes.com/app.
Apple has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and its partner IO, alleging that the AI company has stolen trade secrets and confidential information. The lawsuit specifically names two current OpenAI employees, Chang Liu and Tang Tan, who are former Apple employees, as central to the alleged theft.
Gigi Simo, formerly the CEO of applications and then CEO of AI deployment at OpenAI, is leaving the company. Simo had been on extended medical leave and her responsibilities will be divided among other executives.
Stanford economist Eric Brinslow discussed a new warning from hundreds of economists and researchers about the increasing risk of AI-driven job losses. The discussion highlighted the growing concern among experts regarding the economic impact of artificial intelligence.
The conversation touched upon the fluidity of talent between AI companies, noting that in California, non-compete agreements are difficult to enforce. This leads to employees frequently moving between companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google DeepMind, potentially taking knowledge and trade secrets with them.
The Trump administration has lifted export control directives on Anthropic's advanced AI models, Fable 5 and Mythos 5. The initial ban, citing a "jailbreak issue" allegedly discovered by Amazon, had halted access for many users. The reversal comes after Anthropic pushed back, suggesting similar vulnerabilities exist in other major AI models.
OpenAI is reportedly delaying the public release of its new GPT 5.6 model, opting for a phased rollout to government-approved partners. This move appears to be influenced by the Trump administration's increasing involvement in AI regulation, with the government requesting the company limit the model's broader availability.
The hosts criticize the Trump administration's approach to AI regulation, describing it as a "de facto licensing regime" with "no known rules" and "no transparency whatsoever." They argue that this arbitrary oversight creates "authoritarian limbo" for AI companies.