← Front page

Bloomberg Surveillance · Friday, July 31, 2026

Fed's Reduced Forward Guidance Explained as Limiting Committee, Not Eliminating Reaction Function

Bill Dudley clarifies that his criticism of the Fed is not against reducing forward guidance, but rather the lack of clarity on the Fed's monetary policy reaction function. He argues that while forward guidance is unnecessary outside of the zero lower bound, understanding how the Fed will react to incoming data is crucial for market pricing and reducing uncertainty.

personBill DudleycompanyFederal Reserve

The tape

3 quotes
You're not against reducing forward guidance. This is important. I think that the complaints about the people doing the complaining often or around the idea that somehow we still want our hands being helled, that we want to hold on to the post GFC communication architecture, and Bill, I don't think that's what your criticism is about, no.
Speaker 2
But that doesn't mean you don't want to know what the Fed's monetary policy reaction function is. And I think that's the real problem Abortion and it's comments is conflating the two and they're very very different.
Speaker 6
If I don't understand how the FED reeser is going to react to incoming information, I can't price financial markets correctly. And it's also creating a lot of uncertainty about what policy is going to be in the future.
Speaker 6
Heard on Bloomberg Surveillance — “Bloomberg Surveillance TV: July 31st, 2026, published Friday, July 31, 2026. Heardvine summarizes and quotes with attribution and timestamps, and links to the original everywhere.
Transcribed via publisher transcript · $0.00
Fed's Reduced Forward Guidance Explained as Limiting Committee, Not Eliminating Reaction Function — Heardvine